Plywood Container Packing Calculation 2026 – Factory-Level 40HC Packing Tables | HCPLY

“PILLAR TECHNICAL REFERENCE PAGE
Factory-issued plywood container packing calculation & container optimization specification
This document is an official plywood container packing calculation reference issued by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood, a leading plywood manufacturer, supplier, and exporter in Vietnam.
All data, formulas, and container configurations presented here are based on real factory loading experience, actual 40HC container constraints, and long-term plywood export programs to Europe and global markets.
This is not a generic guideline, estimated spreadsheet, or trader-level assumption.
This page provides a factory-level plywood container packing calculation framework, designed to explain how plywood export packing specifications are calculated, validated, and executed in real 40HC container loading operations.
The plywood container packing calculation methods shown here are actively used by HCPLY production, QC, and logistics teams to optimize:
Pallet configuration
Container payload utilization
CBM efficiency
Export safety and repeatability
across different plywood core types, thickness ranges, and sheet dimensions.
Every packing table in this document reflects what is physically loaded and shipped, not what is theoretically possible on paper.

David Duc Do

🧭 SECTION 1 – WHY THIS PAGE EXISTS

⚙️ Why Plywood Container Packing Calculation Matters at Factory Level

For professional plywood importers, plywood container packing calculation is not a formatting detail, a spreadsheet exercise, or a sales attachment appended to a quotation.

It is a factory-level control system that directly determines:

• Real container payload utilization
• Landed cost per CBM and per sheet
• Panel integrity after long-distance sea transport
• Repeatability and stability of long-term supply programs

In real export operations, plywood container packing calculation influences total shipment cost and risk exposure more than nominal plywood price itself.

A small deviation in packing logic — often invisible at quotation stage — can silently shift total CBM, exceed payload limits, or trigger downstream costs that only appear after container loading or arrival.

Across the global plywood trade, most plywood container packing calculation data circulating in the market is structurally flawed.

---

🔍 1.1️⃣ The Structural Failure of Market-Level Packing Data

Most packing specifications exchanged online or during negotiation are based on:

• Generic spreadsheet estimates
• Trader-level assumptions without factory validation
• Simplified figures that ignore real 40HC container geometry and payload ceilings

The result is a persistent gap between theoretical plywood container packing calculation and factory-executed container loading.

This gap is one of the most common root causes of:

• Payload overruns requiring last-minute sheet removal
• CBM inefficiency that inflates landed cost per unit
• Panel deformation, edge damage, or compression after arrival
• Disputes between buyers, suppliers, and logistics providers

These issues do not originate from ports, shipping lines, or freight forwarders.

They originate inside the factory — at the plywood container packing calculation and loading stage.

---

⚖️ 1.2️⃣ Factory-Issued Calculation vs Market Assumptions

This page exists to establish one non-negotiable distinction:

Factory-issued plywood container packing calculation is not equivalent to market-level estimates.

All packing tables and calculations presented here are:

• Based on actual pallet configurations used in export shipments
• Calculated under real 40HC internal dimensions and payload limits
• Aligned with measured plywood core density by species
• Validated through repeated factory loading programs, not one-off trials

This is why identical plywood thickness and sheet size can result in different CBM, weight, and pallet counts depending on core type and factory execution logic.

In practical terms, plywood container packing calculation is factory-specific, not universal.

---

🌍 1.3️⃣ Why Plywood Container Packing Calculation Is Critical in 2025–2026

In the current export environment, plywood container packing calculation has become a primary risk-control variable, not a secondary logistics detail.

Buyers now face:

• Volatile ocean freight rates
• Stricter payload enforcement at ports and inland depots
• Increased penalties for overweight containers
• Reduced tolerance for shipment discrepancies

Under these conditions, inaccurate plywood container packing calculation is no longer a minor inefficiency.

It is a commercial, operational, and contractual risk.

For serious importers, predictability — not optimistic estimates — is the only acceptable standard.

---

🧠 1.4️⃣ Original Factory Data – Why This Reference Exists

This export packing specification is not compiled from public sources.

To the best of HCPLY’s knowledge, no equivalent plywood container packing calculation dataset — with this level of factory validation, execution logic, and transparency — has been previously published in Vietnam or globally.

This document represents the first public compilation of plywood export packing specifications that are:

• Derived from real container loading at factory level
• Validated across multiple plywood core structures
• Optimized through repeated export programs, not simulations
• Documented with explicit formulas and physical constraints

All tables on this page were authored and verified by David Duc Do, based on hands-on experience overseeing plywood production, palletization, and plywood container packing calculation for international export markets.

This data exists because it was required for factory execution —
not because it was created for marketing, SEO, or content volume.

---

📌 1.5️⃣ Industry Statement (Operational Reality)

If a supplier cannot clearly explain their plywood container packing calculation at factory level, they are not controlling their factory.

This statement reflects operational reality across plywood manufacturing and export execution — not theory.

---

🚫 1.6️⃣ What This Page Is Not

This plywood container packing calculation reference is not:

• A generalized guideline applicable to all factories
• A maximum-CBM marketing claim
• A spreadsheet model detached from execution

HCPLY does not retro-adjust packing figures after pricing, booking, or quotation issuance.

---

🔒 1.7️⃣ Scope, Responsibility, and Execution Boundary

This plywood container packing calculation reference defines factory-executed packing logic under standard conditions.

Final loading execution may vary if buyers request:

• Non-standard pallet dimensions or stacking heights
• Mixed SKUs within a single container
• Destination-specific regulations or handling constraints

Any deviation from the published tables must be recalculated and revalidated at factory level before execution.

---

🎯 1.8️⃣ Who This Reference Is For

This technical reference is designed for:

• European and global plywood importers
• Purchasing managers and sourcing teams
• Logistics planners and QA professionals
• Buyers evaluating suppliers at factory level, not trader level

It is not written for casual readers or generic market education.

Every table on this page enables buyers to:

• Audit supplier packing claims
• Compare core structures objectively
• Forecast landed cost using real plywood container packing calculation
• Reduce disputes before production begins

---

🧭 1.9️⃣ How This Page Must Be Used

Each section below corresponds to:

• One specific core type
• One defined sheet size
• One fixed pallet and container configuration

This page must be referenced before price comparison, not after.

Price without verified plywood container packing calculation is incomplete information.

🧮 SECTION 2 – HOW HCPLY CALCULATES PACKING

⚙️ Factory-Level Plywood Container Packing Calculation Methodology

At HCPLY, plywood container packing calculation is not a spreadsheet exercise, a logistics assumption, or a sales-side estimate.

It is a factory-controlled methodology derived from real container loading, pallet handling, and export execution — applied consistently across long-term plywood shipment programs.

Every plywood container packing calculation presented in this document is constrained by physical reality:

what can be lifted, stacked, loaded, transported, and repeatedly executed at factory level — not what appears optimal on paper.

All figures shown below are derived from actual container loading, not theoretical math models.

---

🧠 2️⃣ How HCPLY Performs Plywood Container Packing Calculation at Factory Level

HCPLY applies plywood container packing calculation as an operational control system, not a post-production adjustment.

This methodology integrates three layers simultaneously:

• ⚙️ Physical container constraints
• ⚙️ Pallet handling and stacking limits
• ⚙️ Material-specific properties of plywood

A packing configuration is only accepted when it can be executed repeatedly without deviation across multiple shipments.

If a calculation cannot be executed at factory level, it is rejected — regardless of how efficient it looks on paper.

Negative definition (important):
HCPLY does not retro-adjust packing figures after pricing, booking, or quotation issuance.

---

⛔ 2.1️⃣ Fixed Variables

(Non-Negotiable Factory Constraints in Plywood Container Packing Calculation)

These variables are structural constraints.
They are constant across all calculations and cannot be altered by sales assumptions or buyer expectations.

They form the hard boundary of every plywood container packing calculation.

---

⛔ Container Constraint

• Container type: 40HC
• Maximum safe payload: 28.5 metric tons
• Payload ceiling is applied before CBM optimization
• Container wall clearance, door clearance, and safety margins are fully considered

The payload limit is treated as a hard stop, not a target.

Any plywood container packing calculation that exceeds this limit is invalid — regardless of CBM efficiency.

---

⛔ Pallet Constraints

• Fixed pallet footprint based on factory forklift handling standards
• Maximum pallet height governed by:
  • Forklift stability
  • Warehouse stacking safety
  • Container roof clearance
• Pallet weight distribution optimized to avoid point loading and deformation

No pallet configuration is accepted in plywood container packing calculation unless it can be:

• Safely lifted
• Repeatedly stacked
• Loaded without deformation risk

---

⛔ Forklift & Stacking Limits

• Forklift-rated lifting capacity applied with safety margins
• Dynamic load during turning and stacking is considered
• Center-of-gravity limits are strictly enforced

This ensures that every plywood container packing calculation reflects what can be executed, not merely what can be calculated.

---

🧩 Transition Logic

Once fixed constraints are locked, material variables become the only levers available in plywood container packing calculation.

---

🌳 2.2️⃣ Variable Factors

(Material-Dependent Inputs in Plywood Container Packing Calculation)

These variables change by product type and directly affect final packing outcomes.

They are measured, not assumed.

---

🌳 Core Density

Each plywood core species used by HCPLY has a measured average density, not a catalog value.

Examples:

• Eucalyptus core: higher density → higher payload sensitivity
• Styrax core: lighter density → higher CBM efficiency

Density variation is monitored across production batches.

In plywood container packing calculation, core density directly determines:

• Total allowable sheets per container
• CBM vs weight trade-off
• Safe pallet stacking height

---

📐 Thickness

Thickness affects plywood container packing calculation non-linearly due to:

• Accumulated tolerance across stacked sheets
• Pressing variance
• Edge compression under load

As thickness increases:

• Sheets per pallet decrease
• Pallet count may remain fixed
• CBM and payload shift differently depending on core density

This is why thickness cannot be evaluated independently from core type.

---

📏 Sheet Size

Sheet dimensions directly impact plywood container packing calculation through:

• Pallet footprint utilization
• Container wall and door clearance
• Dead-space accumulation per layer

Different sheet sizes cannot share the same packing logic, even at identical thickness and core type.

---

🔍 2.3️⃣ Why Theoretical Packing Math Is Rejected

HCPLY does not calculate packing using:

• Nominal density values
• Idealized stacking assumptions
• “Maximum CBM” marketing figures

Theoretical models ignore:

• Tolerance accumulation
• Pallet deformation under load
• Container loading sequence constraints

Every plywood container packing calculation published here has passed physical loading validation before becoming a reference.

---

🧾 2.4️⃣ What This Plywood Container Packing Calculation Methodology Guarantees Buyers

By using factory-derived plywood container packing calculation, buyers gain:

• Predictable container payload outcomes
• Accurate landed cost forecasting
• Reduced loading-stage disputes
• Alignment between approved data and shipped reality

This methodology ensures that what is quoted, loaded, shipped, and received remains structurally aligned.

---

🧠 2.5️⃣ How to Read the Packing Tables in the Next Sections

Each packing table below represents a closed, validated system, built on:

• One fixed container model
• One defined pallet configuration
• One core type
• One sheet size range

Variables must not be mixed across tables.

Using values from different tables together invalidates the plywood container packing calculation.

Each table reflects a complete plywood container packing calculation — validated by real factory execution.

---

📑 SECTION 3 – PACKING TABLE INDEX

🔹 3️⃣ Packing Specification Tables – Quick Index

This section provides a quick-access navigation index to all factory-issued plywood container packing calculation tables included in this document.

Each table listed below represents a complete and valid plywood container packing calculation, calculated, executed, and verified at factory level by HCPLY in accordance with the methodology defined in SECTION 2.

Tables are organized by core type, sheet size, and pallet configuration to help importers, sales teams, and logistics planners locate the correct reference efficiently.

---

⚠️ Important

Packing data must always be read within its original table context.

• Do not mix variables across different tables
• Do not extrapolate pallet logic, CBM, or weight figures
• Do not combine values from separate packing programs

Using values outside their original table context invalidates the plywood container packing calculation and leads to inaccurate cost or loading assumptions.

---

All tables above follow the same factory-level plywood container packing calculation framework and differ only by core density, sheet dimensions, and pallet execution logic.

---

🔗 Quick Jump Index

• 🔹 Styrax Core Plywood – 1220 × 2440 mm
  (18 pallets / 40HC)
• 🔹 Acacia Core Plywood – 1220 × 2440 mm
  (16 pallets / 40HC)
• 🔹 Eucalyptus Core Plywood – 1220 × 2440 mm
  (15 pallets / 40HC)
• 🔹 Styrax Core Plywood – 1250 × 2500 mm
  (18 pallets / 40HC)
• 🔹 Acacia Core Plywood – 1250 × 2500 mm
  (16 pallets / 40HC)
• 🔹 Eucalyptus Core Plywood – 1250 × 2500 mm
  (15 pallets / 40HC)

🧠 How This Index Should Be Used

• Buyers should jump directly to the table matching their exact product specification
• Sales teams should reference one packing table per quotation
• Logistics teams should align container loading plans strictly to the selected table

When reviewing any table, readers must rely on SECTION 2 to understand the underlying plywood container packing calculation logic and constraints.

This index exists to ensure speed, clarity, and zero ambiguity when applying factory packing data.

📦 SECTION 4️⃣ – Packing Specification – Styrax Core Plywood (1220 × 2440 mm)

This packing specification represents a fully validated factory loading program for Styrax core plywood with standard sheet size 1220 × 2440 mm, optimized for 40HC containers.

This table represents a real-world plywood container packing calculation,
validated through repeated factory loading of Styrax core plywood in 40HC containers.

Styrax core plywood is widely used for:

• Interior applications
• Furniture panels
• Veneer overlay and lamination programs

Its low core density allows HCPLY to maximize CBM utilization while keeping container weight safely below structural limits.

---

⚠️ Original Factory-Issued Technical Data

The packing tables below contain original factory-derived data, first compiled and published by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood.

All calculations are based on actual plywood loading execution, not industry estimates or third-party spreadsheets.

This reference was authored by David Duc Do, drawing from real-world factory packing programs across multiple plywood core structures.

Reproduction or reuse of these tables without proper attribution misrepresents the source and execution context of the data.

📊 Packing Specification Table – Styrax Core (18 Pallets / 40HC)

THICKNESS (MM)	SHEETS / PALLET	PALLETS / 40HC	TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC	SHEETS / CBM	APPROX. CBM / 40HC	APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT)
3	333	18	5994	111.98	53.53	26.76
4	250	18	4500	83.98	53.58	26.79
5	200	18	3600	67.19	53.58	26.79
6	166	18	2988	55.99	53.37	26.68
8	125	18	2250	41.99	53.58	26.79
9	111	18	1998	37.33	53.53	26.76
10	100	18	1800	33.59	53.58	26.79
11	90	18	1620	30.54	53.05	26.52
12	83	18	1494	27.99	53.37	26.68
14	71	18	1278	24.00	53.26	26.63
15	66	18	1188	22.40	53.05	26.52
16	62	18	1116	21.00	53.15	26.58
17	58	18	1044	19.76	52.83	26.42
18	55	18	990	18.66	53.05	26.52
21	47	18	846	16.00	52.89	26.44
25	40	18	720	13.44	53.58	26.79

---

🧠 How to Read & Verify This Packing Table (Factory-Level Explanation)

This section explains exactly how each column in the packing table is calculated, based on real factory packing logic, not abstract logistics theory.

If you understand this section, you can independently audit any plywood packing claim in the market.

---

📐 THICKNESS (MM) — Panel Thickness

• Thickness refers to the nominal thickness of one plywood sheet (in millimeters).
• This value directly determines the volume of each sheet.

Volume per sheet formula:

Sheet volume (CBM) = Thickness (mm) × Length (mm) × Width (mm) ÷ 1,000,000,000

For 1220 × 2440 mm plywood, thickness is the only variable affecting volume per sheet.

---

📦 SHEETS / PALLET — Sheets per Pallet (Factory Constraint)

• This is the number of sheets stacked on one pallet.
• For Styrax core plywood (1220 × 2440 mm), HCPLY uses a standard pallet stack height of 1000 mm, which is proven to be:
  • Forklift-safe
  • Structurally stable
  • Optimal for container loading

Factory calculation logic:

Sheets / Pallet = ROUNDDOWN(1000 ÷ Thickness_mm)

• Example (6 mm):1000 ÷ 6 = 166.6 → 166 sheets
• This is exactly the Excel formula used in HCPLY factory calculations.

⚠️ This is why sheet count does not scale linearly with thickness.

---

🚢 PALLETS / 40HC — Pallet Count per Container

• Styrax core plywood is a light-density core, allowing higher pallet count.
• Through repeated loading trials, HCPLY standardized 18 pallets per 40HC as the maximum safe and efficient configuration.

Real container loading logic:

• 16 pallets laid flat (4 × 4 grid)
• 2 pallets placed vertically at container ends
• Total: 18 pallets
• This layout:
  • Eliminates dead space
  • Maintains load balance
  • Avoids pallet deformation
  • Fits 40HC internal geometry perfectly

This is experience-based factory logic, not theoretical container math.

---

🔢 TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC — Total Sheets per Container

This value is purely arithmetic, once pallet logic is fixed.

Formula:

Total Sheets / 40HC = Sheets / Pallet × Pallets / 40HC

Example (6 mm):

166 × 18 = 2,988 sheets

---

📊 SHEETS / CBM — Sheets per Cubic Meter

This indicates packing efficiency, not pallet logic.

Exact calculation used:

Sheets / CBM = 1 ÷ (1.22 × 2.44 × (Thickness_mm ÷ 1000))

• Result is usually non-integer (decimal).
• This is normal and correct.
• Rounding would destroy accuracy.

This metric allows cross-core and cross-country comparison.

---

📐 APPROX. CBM / 40HC — Total Volume per Container

CBM is derived from actual sheet count, not guessed.

Formula:

Approx. CBM / 40HC = Total Sheets / 40HC ÷ Sheets / CBM

Because:

• Pallet footprint is fixed
• Stack height is capped
• Sheet count adjusts by thickness

→ CBM stays within a tight band (~52.8 – 53.6 CBM).

---

⚖️ APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT) — Container Payload

• Weight is calculated from volume × measured core density.
• For Styrax core plywood, HCPLY uses:

Average density = 500 kg / CBM

Formula:

Net Weight (MT) = Approx. CBM × 500 ÷ 1000

This keeps total payload:

• Safely below 28.5 MT
• Compatible with:
  • Chassis axle limits
  • Port handling limits
  • Long-distance sea freight safety

---

📝 Factory Calculation Note (Official Reference)

NOTE:
Packing calculation is based on Styrax core plywood,
18 pallets / 40HC, sheet size 1220 × 2440 mm,
average density 500 kg/CBM, optimized for a 40HC container with a maximum payload of 28.5 MT.

All CBM and weight figures are approximate and derived from factory-executed loading programs, not theoretical assumptions.

© HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood | Factory-issued technical reference

---

🧭 Why This Table Is a “Gold Standard” for Professionals

• Newcomers see numbers
• Professionals see:
  • Cost predictability
  • Container efficiency
  • Dispute prevention
  • Supplier credibility

If a supplier cannot explain their packing table at this level, they are not controlling their factory process.

This table is not marketing.
It is operational truth.

---

💰 What This Means for Import Cost

From a commercial perspective, this packing structure delivers:

• Lower CIF cost per sheet due to high sheet density per container
• Stable freight calculation across thickness ranges
• Higher container efficiency compared to heavier eucalyptus or birch-core panels

When benchmarked against China or ex-Russia plywood programs, Styrax core plywood from Vietnam typically offers:

• Better CBM utilization
• Lower risk of overweight penalties
• More predictable landed cost per panel

---

🖼️ Visual Reference – Factory Packing Chart

Image below is provided for visual verification only.
All official data references remain the table above.

(Factory Excel packing chart with HCPLY watermark – for reference & audit support)

🔎 Transition to Next Packing Table

The packing logic demonstrated in SECTION 4 establishes the baseline execution model for factory-level plywood container packing calculation.

In the following section, the same calculation framework is applied to Acacia core plywood, where higher core density alters pallet count, total sheets per container, and payload behavior — while container geometry and methodology remain unchanged.

📦 SECTION 5️⃣ – Packing Specification – Acacia Core Plywood (1220 × 2440 mm)

This packing specification represents a fully validated factory loading program for Acacia core plywood with standard sheet size 1220 × 2440 mm, optimized for 40HC containers.

This table reflects a real-world plywood container packing calculation, executed and verified through repeated factory loading of Acacia core plywood under export conditions — not theoretical pallet math or trader-level estimates.

---

🌳 Application Context – Why Acacia Core Matters

Acacia core plywood is widely used for:

• Furniture components and structural panels
• Interior applications requiring higher screw-holding strength
• Lamination and overlay programs where panel rigidity is critical

Compared to Styrax core, Acacia core plywood has higher average density, which directly impacts pallet count, CBM efficiency, and payload behavior in plywood container packing calculation.

This makes Acacia an ideal reference for buyers who prioritize structural strength and consistency over maximum CBM.

---

⚠️ Original Factory-Issued Technical Data

The packing table below contains original factory-derived data, compiled and published by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood.

All values are based on actual palletization, forklift handling, and container loading execution, not spreadsheet simulations or market averages.

This reference was authored and verified by David Duc Do, based on hands-on experience overseeing Acacia core plywood production, pallet stacking, and plywood container packing calculation across multiple export programs.

Reproduction or reuse of this table without proper attribution misrepresents the source and execution context of the data.

---

📊 Packing Specification Table – Acacia Core (16 Pallets / 40HC)

THICKNESS (MM)	SHEETS / PALLET	PALLETS / 40HC	TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC	SHEETS / CBM	APPROX. CBM / 40HC	APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT)
3	333	16	5,328	111.98	47.58	27.60
4	250	16	4,000	83.98	47.63	27.62
5	200	16	3,200	67.19	47.63	27.62
6	166	16	2,656	55.99	47.44	27.51
8	125	16	2,000	41.99	47.63	27.62
9	111	16	1,776	37.33	47.58	27.60
10	100	16	1,600	33.59	47.63	27.62
11	90	16	1,440	30.54	47.15	27.35
12	83	16	1,328	27.99	47.44	27.51
14	71	16	1,136	24.00	47.34	27.46
15	66	16	1,056	22.40	47.15	27.35
16	62	16	992	21.00	47.25	27.40
17	58	16	928	19.76	46.96	27.24
18	55	16	880	18.66	47.15	27.35
21	47	16	752	16.00	47.01	27.27
25	40	16	640	13.44	47.63	27.62

---

🧠 How to Read & Verify This Packing Table (Factory-Level Explanation)

This section explains how each column in the table is derived, using real factory packing logic, ensuring buyers can independently audit the plywood container packing calculation.

---

📐 THICKNESS (MM) — Panel Thickness

Thickness refers to the nominal thickness of a single plywood sheet.

For 1220 × 2440 mm, thickness is the sole variable affecting volume per sheet.

📦 Sheet Volume Formula (CBM)

Sheet Volume (CBM) = Thickness (mm) × 1.22 × 2.44 ÷ 1000

Thickness directly controls both sheets per pallet and payload sensitivity in plywood container packing calculation.

---

📦 SHEETS / PALLET — Sheets per Pallet (Factory Constraint)

HCPLY applies a fixed pallet stack height of 1000 mm for Acacia core plywood, governed by:

• Forklift lifting stability
• Pallet compression limits
• Long-term stacking repeatability

🧮 Factory Formula – Sheets per Pallet

Sheets / Pallet = ROUNDDOWN(1000 ÷ Thickness_mm)

Example (6 mm):

1000 ÷ 6 = 166.6 → 166 sheets

This explains why sheet counts do not scale linearly with thickness.

---

🚢 PALLETS / 40HC — Pallet Count per Container

Due to higher core density, Acacia core plywood is standardized at:

📦 16 pallets per 40HC

This configuration balances:

• Payload ceiling (28.5 MT)
• Pallet weight distribution
• Container floor loading safety

Increasing pallet count would exceed safe payload limits, even if CBM allows.

---

🔢 TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC — Total Sheets per Container

Once pallet logic is fixed:

🔢 Total Sheets Formula

Total Sheets / 40HC = Sheets / Pallet × 16

Example (6 mm):

166 × 16 = 2,656 sheets

This value is purely arithmetic, but only valid because upstream constraints are locked.

---

📊 SHEETS / CBM — Packing Efficiency Metric

Sheets / CBM reflects volumetric efficiency, calculated as:

📐 Sheets per CBM Formula

Sheets / CBM = 1 ÷ (1.22 × 2.44 × Thickness)

This metric enables objective comparison across core types and thickness ranges without confusing pallet logic.

---

📐 APPROX. CBM / 40HC — Total Volume

CBM is derived from actual sheet count:

📦 Total CBM Formula

Approx. CBM / 40HC = Total Sheets ÷ Sheets / CBM

Because pallet footprint and stack height are fixed, CBM for Acacia core stabilizes around ~47.0 – 47.6 CBM, lower than Styrax due to density constraints.

---

⚖️ APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT) — Payload Control

Weight is calculated using measured average density, not catalog values.

⚖️ Average Density (Acacia core)

580 kg / CBM

⚖️ Net Weight Formula

Net Weight (MT) = Approx. CBM × 580 ÷ 1000

This keeps payload consistently below 28.5 MT, ensuring compliance with chassis, port, and sea freight limits.

---

📝 Factory Calculation Note (Official Reference)

NOTE:
Packing calculation is based on Acacia core plywood,
16 pallets / 40HC, sheet size 1220 × 2440 mm,
average density 580 kg/CBM, optimized for a 40HC container with a maximum payload of 28.5 MT.

All CBM and weight figures are approximate and derived from factory-executed loading programs, not theoretical assumptions.

© HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood | Factory-issued technical reference

---

🧭 Why This Table Is a “Gold Standard” for Professionals

Newcomers see numbers.
Professionals see:

• Payload discipline
• Predictable container outcomes
• Verified factory control
• Reduced dispute risk

If a supplier cannot explain Acacia core plywood packing at this level, they are not controlling their plywood container packing calculation.

🖼️ Visual Reference – Factory Packing Chart (Acacia Core)

Image below is provided for visual verification only.

All official data references, calculations, and commercial decisions must rely on the packing table and explanations above.

(Factory Excel packing chart with HCPLY watermark – for reference & audit support)

---

💰 What This Means for Import Cost

From a commercial perspective, this packing structure delivers:

• Higher structural integrity per sheet
• Stable payload near optimal container limits
• Predictable CIF cost across thickness ranges

Compared to Styrax core, Acacia core plywood trades lower CBM efficiency for higher strength and consistency, a trade-off many professional buyers intentionally choose.

---

🔎 Transition to Next Packing Table

With Acacia core packing logic established, the next section applies the same plywood container packing calculation methodology to Eucalyptus core plywood, where even higher density further reshapes pallet strategy, CBM efficiency, and payload behavior — under identical container constraints.

📦 SECTION 6️⃣ – Packing Specification – Eucalyptus Core Plywood (1220 × 2440 mm)

This packing specification represents a fully validated factory loading program for Eucalyptus core plywood with standard sheet size 1220 × 2440 mm, optimized for 40HC containers.

This table reflects a real-world plywood container packing calculation, executed and verified through repeated factory loading of Eucalyptus core plywood under export conditions — not theoretical pallet math or generalized logistics assumptions.

---

🌳 Application Context – Why Eucalyptus Core Matters

Eucalyptus core plywood is commonly selected for:

• Structural interior components
• Load-bearing furniture applications
• Projects requiring higher panel density and stiffness

Compared to Styrax and Acacia cores, Eucalyptus core plywood has the highest average density, which fundamentally reshapes pallet count, CBM efficiency, and payload behavior in plywood container packing calculation.

This makes Eucalyptus the upper-bound reference for payload-controlled container planning.

---

⚠️ Original Factory-Issued Technical Data

The packing table below contains original factory-derived data, compiled and published by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood.

All figures are based on actual palletization, forklift handling, and real container loading execution, not spreadsheet simulations or third-party estimates.

This reference was authored and verified by David Duc Do, based on hands-on supervision of Eucalyptus core plywood production, stacking behavior, and plywood container packing calculation across multiple export shipments.

Reproduction or reuse of this table without proper attribution misrepresents the source and execution context of the data.

---

📊 Packing Specification Table – Eucalyptus Core (15 Pallets / 40HC)

THICKNESS (MM)	SHEETS / PALLET	PALLETS / 40HC	TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC	SHEETS / CBM	APPROX. CBM / 40HC	APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT)
3	323	15	4,845	111.98	43.27	28.12
4	242	15	3,630	83.98	43.22	28.10
5	194	15	2,910	67.19	43.31	28.15
6	161	15	2,415	55.99	43.13	28.04
8	121	15	1,815	41.99	43.22	28.10
9	107	15	1,605	37.33	43.00	27.95
10	97	15	1,455	33.59	43.31	28.15
11	88	15	1,320	30.54	43.22	28.10
12	80	15	1,200	27.99	42.87	27.86
14	69	15	1,035	24.00	43.13	28.04
15	64	15	960	22.40	42.87	27.86
16	60	15	900	21.00	42.87	27.86
17	57	15	855	19.76	43.27	28.12
18	53	15	795	18.66	42.60	27.69
21	46	15	690	16.00	43.13	28.04
25	38	15	570	13.44	42.42	27.57

---

🧠 How to Read & Verify This Packing Table (Factory-Level Explanation)

This section explains how each column is derived using real factory packing logic, allowing buyers to independently audit the plywood container packing calculation.

---

📐 THICKNESS (MM) — Panel Thickness

Thickness refers to the nominal thickness of a single plywood sheet.

For 1220 × 2440 mm, thickness is the only variable affecting volume per sheet.

📦 Sheet Volume Formula (CBM)

Sheet Volume (CBM) = Thickness (mm) × 1.22 × 2.44 ÷ 1000

Thickness directly controls sheets per pallet, CBM utilization, and payload sensitivity in plywood container packing calculation.

---

📦 SHEETS / PALLET — Sheets per Pallet (Factory Constraint)

For Eucalyptus core plywood, pallet stacking logic differs from lighter cores due to significantly higher material density.

Based on factory loading experience, HCPLY does not use a full 1000 mm pallet height for eucalyptus core plywood.

Instead, pallet height is intentionally reduced to 970 mm to control:

• Individual pallet weight
• Forklift handling safety
• Container payload stability

This adjustment reduces the number of sheets per pallet, ensuring ideal weight distribution while maintaining stacking integrity.

🧮 Factory Formula – Sheets per Pallet (Eucalyptus Core)

Sheets / Pallet = ROUNDDOWN(970 ÷ Thickness_mm)

Example (6 mm):

970 ÷ 6 = 161.6 → 161 sheets

🔒 Factory-Level Execution Insight

This pallet height adjustment is not optional.
It is a structural control mechanism that separates factory-executed plywood container packing calculation from spreadsheet-based theoretical loading models.

This explains why eucalyptus core plywood consistently shows lower sheets per pallet compared to Styrax or Acacia cores at the same thickness.

The reduction is intentional, not a calculation error — it reflects real factory pallet weight control required for high-density plywood.res.

---

🚢 PALLETS / 40HC — Pallet Count per Container

Due to high core density, Eucalyptus core plywood is standardized at:

📦 15 pallets per 40HC

This limit is defined by payload control, not container volume.

Exceeding 15 pallets would surpass safe 28.5 MT payload, even when CBM capacity remains available.

---

🔢 TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC — Total Sheets per Container

Once pallet and container logic are fixed:

🔢 Total Sheets Formula

Total Sheets / 40HC = Sheets / Pallet × 15

This ensures predictable sheet counts across all thickness ranges.

---

📊 SHEETS / CBM — Packing Efficiency Metric

Sheets / CBM measures volumetric efficiency, independent of pallet count.

📐 Sheets per CBM Formula

Sheets / CBM = 1 ÷ (1.22 × 2.44 × Thickness)

This metric allows direct comparison with Styrax and Acacia cores under the same sheet size.

---

📐 APPROX. CBM / 40HC — Total Volume

CBM is derived from actual sheet counts:

📦 Total CBM Formula

Approx. CBM / 40HC = Total Sheets ÷ Sheets / CBM

Because pallet footprint and stack height are fixed, CBM for Eucalyptus core stabilizes around ~42.4 – 43.3 CBM, lower than lighter cores.

---

⚖️ APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT) — Payload Control

Weight is calculated using measured average density, not catalog data.

⚖️ Average Density (Eucalyptus core)

650 kg / CBM

⚖️ Net Weight Formula

Net Weight (MT) = Approx. CBM × 650 ÷ 1000

This keeps total payload near but below 28.5 MT, maximizing container efficiency while maintaining compliance with port, chassis, and shipping limits.

---

📝 Factory Calculation Note (Official Reference)

NOTE:
Packing calculation is based on Eucalyptus core plywood,
15 pallets / 40HC, sheet size 1220 × 2440 mm,
average density 650 kg/CBM, optimized for a 40HC container with a maximum payload of 28.5 MT.

All CBM and weight figures are approximate and derived from factory-executed loading programs, not theoretical assumptions.

© HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood | Factory-issued technical reference

---

🧭 Why This Table Is a “Gold Standard” for Professionals

Newcomers see reduced CBM.
Professionals see:

• Payload discipline
• Structural predictability
• Controlled container risk
• Factory-level execution capability

If a supplier cannot explain Eucalyptus core plywood packing at this level, they are not truly controlling their plywood container packing calculation.

---

💰 What This Means for Import Cost

From a commercial perspective, this packing structure delivers:

• Maximum structural strength per sheet
• Payload-optimized container loading
• Highly predictable landed cost

Compared to Styrax and Acacia cores, Eucalyptus core plywood sacrifices CBM efficiency in exchange for strength, stiffness, and reliability — a deliberate choice for demanding applications.

---

🖼️ Visual Reference – Factory Packing Chart (Eucalyptus Core)

Image below is provided for visual verification only.

All official data references, calculations, and commercial decisions must rely on the packing table and explanations above.

(Factory Excel packing chart with HCPLY watermark – for reference & audit support)

---

🔎 Transition to Next Packing Table

With Eucalyptus core packing logic established, the next section applies the same plywood container packing calculation methodology to larger sheet sizes (1250 × 2500 mm), where container geometry introduces a new layer of constraint.

📦 SECTION 7️⃣ – Packing Specification – Styrax Core Plywood (1250 × 2500 mm)

This packing specification represents a fully validated factory loading program for Styrax core plywood with oversized sheet size 1250 × 2500 mm, optimized specifically for 40HC containers.

This table reflects a real-world plywood container packing calculation, executed and verified through repeated factory loading of Styrax core plywood under export conditions — not theoretical pallet math or spreadsheet-based logistics assumptions.

---

🌳 Application Context – Why Styrax Core (1250 × 2500 mm) Matters

Styrax core plywood in 1250 × 2500 mm is widely selected for:

• Furniture and interior panels requiring larger cutting tolerance
• Lamination and overlay programs
• Export markets preferring non-standard sheet formats

Compared to standard 1220 × 2440 mm panels, this format changes sheet volume, pallet footprint, and CBM efficiency, introducing container geometry as an additional constraint in plywood container packing calculation.

---

⚠️ Original Factory-Issued Technical Data

The packing table below contains original factory-derived data, compiled and published by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood.

All figures are based on:

• Actual palletization
• Forklift handling validation
• Real container loading execution

This reference reflects operational reality, not estimation.

---

📊 Packing Specification Table – Styrax Core (18 Pallets / 40HC)

THICKNESS (MM)	SHEETS / PALLET	PALLETS / 40HC	TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC	SHEETS / CBM	APPROX. CBM / 40HC	APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT)
3	333	18	5,994	106.67	56.19	28.10
4	250	18	4,500	80.00	56.25	28.13
5	200	18	3,600	64.00	56.25	28.13
6	166	18	2,988	53.33	56.03	28.01
8	125	18	2,250	40.00	56.25	28.13
9	111	18	1,998	35.56	56.19	28.10
10	100	18	1,800	32.00	56.25	28.13
11	90	18	1,620	29.09	55.69	27.84
12	83	18	1,494	26.67	56.03	28.01
14	71	18	1,278	22.86	55.91	27.96
15	66	18	1,188	21.33	55.69	27.84
16	62	18	1,116	20.00	55.80	27.90
17	58	18	1,044	18.82	55.46	27.73
18	55	18	990	17.78	55.69	27.84
21	47	18	846	15.24	55.52	27.76
25	40	18	720	12.80	56.25	28.13

---

🧠 How to Read & Verify This Packing Table (Factory-Level Explanation)

This section explains how each column is derived using real factory packing logic, allowing buyers to independently audit the plywood container packing calculation.

---

📐 THICKNESS (MM) — Panel Thickness

Thickness refers to the nominal thickness of a single plywood sheet.

For 1250 × 2500 mm, thickness directly controls sheet volume, not pallet geometry.

📦 Sheet Volume Formula (CBM)

Sheet Volume (CBM) = Thickness (mm) × 1.25 × 2.50 ÷ 1000

---

📦 SHEETS / PALLET — Sheets per Pallet (Factory Constraint)

For Styrax core plywood, HCPLY applies a standard pallet stack height of 1000 mm.

This height is validated as:

• Forklift-safe
• Structurally stable
• Optimal for container loading

🧮 Factory Formula – Sheets per Pallet

Sheets / Pallet = ROUNDDOWN(1000 ÷ Thickness_mm)

Example (6 mm):

1000 ÷ 6 = 166.6 → 166 sheets

🔒 Factory-Level Execution Insight

Maintaining a 1000 mm pallet height is a key enabler that allows Styrax core plywood to achieve high CBM efficiency while staying safely below payload limits in plywood container packing calculation.

---

🚢 PALLETS / 40HC — Pallet Count per Container

Thanks to light core density (~500 kg/CBM), Styrax core plywood supports:

📦 18 pallets per 40HC

This configuration:

• Maximizes container floor utilization
• Maintains load balance
• Avoids pallet deformation

This is experience-based factory logic, not theoretical container math.

---

🔢 TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC — Total Sheets per Container

🔢 Total Sheets Formula

Total Sheets / 40HC = Sheets / Pallet × 18

---

📊 SHEETS / CBM — Packing Efficiency Metric

📐 Sheets per CBM Formula

Sheets / CBM = 1 ÷ (1.25 × 2.50 × Thickness)

This metric allows objective comparison with other core types without confusing pallet logic.

---

📐 APPROX. CBM / 40HC — Total Volume

📦 Total CBM Formula

Approx. CBM / 40HC = Total Sheets ÷ Sheets / CBM

CBM stabilizes around ~55.5 – 56.3 CBM, reflecting optimal container utilization.

---

⚖️ APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT) — Payload Control

⚖️ Average Density (Styrax core)

500 kg / CBM

⚖️ Net Weight Formula

Net Weight (MT) = Approx. CBM × 500 ÷ 1000

This keeps payload safely below 28.5 MT while maximizing CBM.

---

📝 Factory Calculation Note (Official Reference)

NOTE:

Packing calculation is based on Styrax core plywood,
18 pallets / 40HC, sheet size 1250 × 2500 mm,
average density 500 kg/CBM, optimized for a 40HC container with a maximum payload of 28.5 MT.

All CBM and weight figures are approximate and derived from factory-executed loading programs, not theoretical assumptions.

© HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood | Factory-issued technical reference

---

🖼️ Visual Reference – Factory Packing Chart (Styrax Core, 1250 × 2500 mm)

Image below is provided for visual verification only.

(Factory Excel packing chart with HCPLY watermark – for reference & audit support)

---

🔎 Transition to Next Packing Table

With Styrax core packing logic for oversized panels established, the next section applies the same plywood container packing calculation framework to Acacia and Eucalyptus cores in 1250 × 2500 mm, where higher density and container geometry jointly redefine pallet strategy.

📦 SECTION 8️⃣ – Packing Specification – Acacia Core Plywood (1250 × 2500 mm)

This packing specification represents a factory-executed plywood container packing calculation for Acacia core plywood with oversized sheet size 1250 × 2500 mm, optimized for 40HC containers under strict payload control.

Due to higher core density compared to Styrax, Acacia core plywood requires reduced pallet stack height to maintain pallet stability, forklift safety, and compliance with the 28.5 MT payload limit.

---

🌳 Application Context – Why Acacia Core (1250 × 2500 mm) Requires Adjustment

Acacia core plywood in 1250 × 2500 mm is commonly used for:

• Structural interior panels
• Furniture components requiring higher screw-holding strength
• Projects balancing strength, weight, and cost

When combined with oversized sheet geometry, Acacia core density directly reshapes plywood container packing calculation, especially pallet height and pallet count logic.

---

⚠️ Original Factory-Issued Technical Data

The packing table below is derived from actual factory palletization and container loading, issued by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood.

All figures are based on:

• Real pallet stacking programs
• Forklift handling validation
• Multiple export container executions

This reference reflects factory execution, not spreadsheet-based estimation.

---

📊 Packing Specification Table – Acacia Core (16 Pallets / 40HC)

THICKNESS (MM)	SHEETS / PALLET	PALLETS / 40HC	TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC	SHEETS / CBM	APPROX. CBM / 40HC	APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT)
3	323	16	5,168	106.67	48.45	27.62
4	242	16	3,872	80.00	48.40	28.07
5	194	16	3,104	64.00	48.50	28.13
6	161	16	2,576	53.33	48.30	28.01
8	121	16	1,936	40.00	48.40	28.07
9	107	16	1,712	35.56	48.15	27.93
10	97	16	1,552	32.00	48.50	28.13
11	88	16	1,408	29.09	48.40	28.07
12	80	16	1,280	26.67	48.00	27.84
14	69	16	1,104	22.86	48.30	28.01
15	64	16	1,024	21.33	48.00	27.84
16	60	16	960	20.00	48.00	27.84
17	57	16	912	18.82	48.45	28.10
18	53	16	848	17.78	47.70	27.67
21	46	16	736	15.24	48.30	28.01
25	38	16	608	12.80	47.50	27.55

---

🧠 How to Read & Verify This Packing Table (Factory-Level Explanation)

This section explains how each column is derived using real factory logic, allowing buyers to independently audit the plywood container packing calculation.

---

📐 THICKNESS (MM) — Panel Thickness

Thickness refers to the nominal thickness of one plywood sheet.

📦 Sheet Volume Formula (CBM)

Sheet Volume (CBM) = Thickness (mm) × 1.25 × 2.50 ÷ 1000

---

📦 SHEETS / PALLET — Sheets per Pallet (Factory Constraint)

Due to the higher density of Acacia core plywood, HCPLY does not use a full 1000 mm pallet height.

Instead, pallet height is intentionally limited to 970 mm to control pallet weight and ensure handling safety.

🧮 Factory Formula – Sheets per Pallet (Acacia Core)

Sheets / Pallet = ROUNDDOWN(970 ÷ Thickness_mm)

Example (6 mm):

970 ÷ 6 = 161.6 → 161 sheets

🔒 Factory-Level Execution Insight

This reduced pallet height is a structural control measure that separates factory-executed plywood container packing calculation from theoretical loading models.

---

🚢 PALLETS / 40HC — Pallet Count per Container

For Acacia core plywood (1250 × 2500 mm), pallet count is fixed at:

📦 16 pallets per 40HC

This limit is defined by payload control, not container volume.

---

🔢 TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC — Total Sheets per Container

🔢 Total Sheets Formula

Total Sheets / 40HC = Sheets / Pallet × 16

---

📊 SHEETS / CBM — Packing Efficiency Metric

📐 Sheets per CBM Formula

Sheets / CBM = 1 ÷ (1.25 × 2.50 × Thickness)

---

📐 APPROX. CBM / 40HC — Total Volume

📦 Total CBM Formula

Approx. CBM / 40HC = Total Sheets ÷ Sheets / CBM

---

⚖️ APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT) — Payload Control

⚖️ Average Density (Acacia core)

570 kg / CBM

⚖️ Net Weight Formula

Net Weight (MT) = Approx. CBM × 570 ÷ 1000

---

📝 Factory Calculation Note (Official Reference)

NOTE:

Packing calculation is based on Acacia core plywood,
16 pallets / 40HC, sheet size 1250 × 2500 mm,
average density 570 kg/CBM, optimized for a 40HC container with a maximum payload of 28.5 MT.

All CBM and weight figures are approximate and derived from factory-executed loading programs, not theoretical assumptions.

© HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood | Factory-issued technical reference

---

🖼️ Visual Reference – Factory Packing Chart (Acacia Core, 1250 × 2500 mm)

Image below is provided for visual verification only.

(Factory Excel packing chart with HCPLY watermark – for reference & audit support)

---

🔎 Transition to Next Packing Table

With Acacia core packing logic for oversized sheets established, the next section applies the same plywood container packing calculation framework to Eucalyptus core plywood (1250 × 2500 mm), where maximum density creates the strictest payload constraint in the entire series.

📦 SECTION 9️⃣ – Packing Specification – Eucalyptus Core Plywood (1250 × 2500 mm)

This packing specification represents the strictest factory-controlled plywood container packing calculation in the entire series, applied to Eucalyptus core plywood with oversized sheet size 1250 × 2500 mm, optimized for 40HC containers under maximum payload constraint.

Eucalyptus core plywood has the highest density among all core types, making payload—not CBM—the dominant limiting factor in container loading.

---

🌳 Application Context – Why Eucalyptus Core (1250 × 2500 mm) Is the Hardest Case

Eucalyptus core plywood in 1250 × 2500 mm is selected for:

• High-strength structural applications
• Load-bearing furniture components
• Projects requiring stiffness and durability over volume efficiency

When combined with oversized sheet geometry, eucalyptus core creates the most restrictive scenario in plywood container packing calculation, where payload ceiling governs every decision.

---

⚠️ Original Factory-Issued Technical Data

The packing table below is derived from actual factory palletization and real export container loading, issued by HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood.

All figures are based on:

• Physical pallet stacking trials
• Forklift handling limits
• Verified container payload measurements

This table reflects factory execution, not theoretical optimization.

---

📊 Packing Specification Table – Eucalyptus Core (15 Pallets / 40HC)

THICKNESS (MM)	SHEETS / PALLET	PALLETS / 40HC	TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC	SHEETS / CBM	APPROX. CBM / 40HC	APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT)
3	300	15	4,500	106.67	42.19	27.42
4	225	15	3,375	80.00	42.19	27.42
5	180	15	2,700	64.00	42.19	27.42
6	150	15	2,250	53.33	42.19	27.42
8	112	15	1,680	40.00	42.00	27.30
9	100	15	1,500	35.56	42.19	27.42
10	90	15	1,350	32.00	42.19	27.42
11	81	15	1,215	29.09	41.77	27.15
12	75	15	1,125	26.67	42.19	27.42
14	64	15	960	22.86	42.00	27.30
15	60	15	900	21.33	42.19	27.42
16	56	15	840	20.00	42.00	27.30
17	52	15	780	18.82	41.44	26.93
18	50	15	750	17.78	42.19	27.42
21	42	15	630	15.24	41.34	26.87
25	36	15	540	12.80	42.19	27.42

---

🧠 How to Read & Verify This Packing Table (Factory-Level Explanation)

This section explains how each column is derived using real factory constraints, allowing buyers to audit the plywood container packing calculation independently.

---

📐 THICKNESS (MM) — Panel Thickness

Thickness refers to the nominal thickness of one plywood sheet.

📦 Sheet Volume Formula (CBM)

Sheet Volume (CBM) = Thickness (mm) × 1.25 × 2.50 ÷ 1000

---

📦 SHEETS / PALLET — Sheets per Pallet (Payload-Dominated Constraint)

Due to the very high density of Eucalyptus core plywood combined with oversized sheet dimensions (1250 × 2500 mm), pallet stacking is governed strictly by pallet weight and container payload, not by pallet geometry or CBM availability.

For this configuration, HCPLY applies a reduced pallet height of 900 mm to ensure:

• Pallet weight remains within forklift safety limits
• Load distribution stays balanced inside the container
• Total container payload stays safely below 28.5 MT

🧮 Factory Formula – Sheets per Pallet (Eucalyptus Core)

Sheets / Pallet = ROUNDDOWN(900 ÷ Thickness_mm)

Example (6 mm):

900 ÷ 6 = 150 sheets

🔒 Factory-Level Execution Insight

For eucalyptus core plywood, pallet height is intentionally reduced to 900 mm. This is a payload-dominated execution rule — not a volumetric optimization choice.

---

🚢 PALLETS / 40HC — Pallet Count per Container

For Eucalyptus core plywood (1250 × 2500 mm), pallet count is fixed at:

📦 15 pallets per 40HC

Exceeding this number would immediately surpass the 28.5 MT payload limit, even if CBM capacity remains unused.

---

🔢 TOTAL SHEETS / 40HC — Total Sheets per Container

🔢 Total Sheets Formula

Total Sheets / 40HC = Sheets / Pallet × 15

This ensures predictable and auditable sheet quantities.

---

📊 SHEETS / CBM — Packing Efficiency Metric

📐 Sheets per CBM Formula

Sheets / CBM = 1 ÷ (1.25 × 2.50 × Thickness)

This metric highlights how eucalyptus core sacrifices CBM efficiency in favor of strength and stiffness.

---

📐 APPROX. CBM / 40HC — Total Volume

📦 Total CBM Formula

Approx. CBM / 40HC = Total Sheets ÷ Sheets / CBM

CBM stabilizes around ~41.3 – 42.2 CBM, significantly lower than Styrax and Acacia cores due to payload dominance.

---

⚖️ APPROX. NET WEIGHT / 40HC (MT) — Payload Control

⚖️ Average Density (Eucalyptus core)

650 kg / CBM

⚖️ Net Weight Formula

Net Weight (MT) = Approx. CBM × 650 ÷ 1000

This keeps total payload close to but safely below 28.5 MT, maximizing strength per container while remaining compliant.

---

📝 Factory Calculation Note (Official Reference)

NOTE:

Packing calculation is based on Eucalyptus core plywood,
15 pallets / 40HC, sheet size 1250 × 2500 mm,
average density 650 kg/CBM, optimized for a 40HC container with a maximum payload of 28.5 MT.

All CBM and weight figures are approximate and derived from factory-executed loading programs, not theoretical assumptions.

© HCPLY – Vietnam Plywood | Factory-issued technical reference

---

🖼️ Visual Reference – Factory Packing Chart (Eucalyptus Core, 1250 × 2500 mm)

Image below is provided for visual verification only.

(Factory Excel packing chart with HCPLY watermark – for reference & audit support)

---

🔎 Structural Conclusion of Oversized Sheet Series

This section completes the 1250 × 2500 mm plywood container packing calculation series:

• Styrax core → CBM-optimized
• Acacia core → balanced density control
• Eucalyptus core → payload-dominated execution

If a supplier cannot explain eucalyptus core packing at this level, they are not executing real factory-controlled plywood container packing calculation.

🧭 SECTION 10 – DIFFERENT SHEET SIZE IMPACT

How Sheet Size Affects Container Efficiency (1220 × 2440 mm vs 1250 × 2500 mm)

🧠 Role of This Section (Bridge Context)

At this point in the document, all packing tables and calculations are already fixed and locked.
No new data is introduced in this section.

This section serves as a technical bridge between:

• Factory-executed plywood container packing calculation
• Buyer interpretation, expectation, and decision-making

Its purpose is not to compare numbers, but to explain why two sheet sizes can produce fundamentally different container outcomes, even when CBM or payload figures appear similar.

---

📐 10.1 Sheet Size Is Not Just a Dimension — It Is a Container Geometry Decision

A common buyer assumption is that plywood sheet size only affects cutting yield or final application.

From a factory and logistics perspective, this assumption is incomplete.

Sheet size directly determines:

• 📦 Pallet footprint
• 🧱 Pallet layout inside the container
• 🕳️ Void space distribution
• 📊 How CBM is actually utilized
• ⚖️ How weight is distributed across pallets

🔒 Factory Reality Box

Sheet size is not just a measurement.
It is a container geometry constraint that propagates through the entire packing system.

This constraint exists before CBM, before weight calculation, and before customs declaration.

---

⚖️ 10.2 1220 × 2440 mm vs 1250 × 2500 mm — Why the Difference Matters

On paper, the dimensional difference looks small.
Inside a container, the impact is structural.

1220 × 2440 mm

• Aligns more efficiently with standard pallet dimensions
• Produces more predictable pallet layouts
• Typically results in tighter CBM utilization

1250 × 2500 mm

• Increases sheet volume per unit
• Expands pallet footprint
• Alters pallet-to-container alignment
• Introduces unavoidable void spaces in certain configurations

📦 Clarification Box

These effects are not errors and not inefficiencies.
They are physical consequences of container geometry.

---

📉 10.3 Why 1250 × 2500 mm Often Looks “Inefficient” on CBM — But Is Still Chosen

From a purely CBM-based comparison, 1250 × 2500 mm sheets can appear less efficient.
This perception is misleading.

Buyers choose this sheet size because:

• 🪚 Larger sheets reduce downstream cutting waste
• 🧩 Fewer joints are required in furniture or panel applications
• 🏭 Production yield improves at factory or workshop level

⚖️ Program-Level Trade-Off Box

What appears as CBM inefficiency at container level
is often offset by material efficiency at application level.

This is why experienced buyers evaluate total program efficiency, not CBM in isolation.

---

🚫 10.4 Why Buyers Misjudge Container Efficiency by CBM Alone

CBM is a volume metric, not a logistics control metric.

In real plywood container packing calculation, CBM must coexist with:

• 📏 Pallet height constraints
• 📦 Pallet count limits
• 🚜 Forklift handling safety
• ⚠️ Maximum payload (28.5 MT)
• ⚖️ Load balance requirements

A container can have:

• Similar CBM
• Similar total weight
• Yet completely different sheet counts, pallet stability, and audit risk

⚠️ Factory-Executed Truth Box

CBM alone cannot explain container efficiency.
Only geometry-aware, factory-executed packing logic can.

---

🛃 10.5 Sheet Size and Customs Declaration — An Overlooked Consequence

Sheet size also influences how packing data is presented, reviewed, and audited.

Customs officers and auditors do not evaluate:

• Cutting yield
• Application efficiency

They evaluate:

• 📄 Declared CBM
• ⚖️ Declared net weight
• 📦 Pallet count
• 🔗 Consistency between packing list, invoice, and bill of lading

Oversized sheets change:

• How CBM aggregates across pallets
• How weight concentrates per pallet
• How explainable the packing logic is during inspection

🧾 Compliance Reality Box

Sheet size selection must be traceable and explainable,
not just commercially attractive.

---

🧠 10.6 Key Takeaway Before Reading the FAQ

Choosing between 1220 × 2440 mm and 1250 × 2500 mm is not a simple dimension comparison.

It is a decision that directly affects:

• Container layout
• Packing stability
• Payload behavior
• Customs audit clarity
• Overall program risk

📌 Mandatory Buyer Insight

Before questioning any packing table in this document,
this distinction must be clearly understood.

---

🔎 Transition to Buyer-Focused Clarification (FAQ)

With the impact of sheet size now clearly established,
the next section addresses the most common buyer questions surrounding plywood container packing calculation — especially where CBM expectations, thickness selection, and factory reality diverge.

🔑 Authority Framing Before FAQ

The questions in the next section do not arise from missing data.
They arise from misinterpreting container packing through CBM-only thinking.

Read the FAQ as a correction of assumptions, not as additional explanation.

🔷 SECTION 11 – COMMON BUYER QUESTIONS (FAQ – SEO GOLD)

❓ 11.1 Why does CBM look similar, but the container feels “less full”?

This perception comes from confusing volumetric similarity with geometric reality.

Across Sections 4–9, CBM values may appear close because:

• Sheet volume is mathematically consistent
• Total CBM is bounded by pallet count and payload limits

However, what the container feels like is driven by:

• Pallet footprint
• Pallet height decisions
• Void space created by sheet geometry
• Weight concentration per pallet

🔒 Factory Execution Anchor

In factory-executed plywood container packing calculation,
visual fullness is never a decision metric.
Load stability, payload compliance, and audit clarity are.

This is why experienced factories never optimize packing based on how “full” a container looks.

---

❓ 11.2 Why does reducing pallet height increase loading reliability?

Reducing pallet height is not a downgrade.
It is a structural control mechanism.

As demonstrated in:

• Section 6 (Eucalyptus, 1220 × 2440 mm)
• Section 9 (Eucalyptus, 1250 × 2500 mm)

Higher-density plywood introduces risks:

• Overweight pallets
• Forklift instability
• Uneven load transfer inside the container

Lowering pallet height:

• Reduces per-pallet weight variance
• Improves forklift handling safety
• Keeps total payload below the 28.5 MT ceiling

🧠 Factory-Level Truth

A container that loads slightly fewer sheets
but arrives without claims, delays, or audit flags
is more reliable than one optimized purely for quantity.

---

❓ 11.3 Why do some thicknesses seem to “waste space” inside the container?

What appears as wasted space is actually controlled void space.

Certain thicknesses:

• Do not divide evenly into pallet height limits
• Create unavoidable residual height gaps

Instead of forcing extra sheets and risking overload,
factories deliberately preserve these gaps to maintain:

• Payload compliance
• Pallet stability
• Consistent audit explanation

⚠️ Important Clarification

This is not inefficiency.
This is intentional tolerance built into factory packing rules.

Spreadsheet-based estimations often ignore this.
Factory execution does not.

---

❓ 11.4 Can packing be customized without breaking customs consistency?

Yes — but only within controlled factory rules.

Customization is possible only if it maintains:

• Internal logical consistency
• Traceability across documents
• Explainability during inspection

Valid customization examples include:

• Adjusting pallet height within safety margins
• Modifying pallet count under payload ceilings
• Designing mixed-thickness containers with fixed logic

Invalid customization includes:

• Arbitrary sheet additions
• Visual filling of void spaces
• CBM manipulation without structural justification

🔒 Compliance Anchor

Every customization must remain consistent across:
Packing list → Invoice → Bill of Lading → Audit dossier (EUDR / customs).

If a change cannot be explained consistently in all four,
it is rejected at factory level.

---

❓ 11.5 Does HCPLY adjust packing for mixed-thickness containers?

Yes — but never by mixing logic.

Mixed-thickness containers are handled by:

• Applying the strictest constraint first (usually payload)
• Locking pallet height based on the heaviest configuration
• Calculating sheet counts downward, never upward

🧩 Factory Rule

In mixed programs,
the most restrictive thickness governs the entire container logic.

This approach prevents:

• Overloaded pallets
• Inconsistent CBM declarations
• Audit discrepancies

---

❓ 11.6 Why can’t traders or agents provide this level of packing clarity?

Because this clarity does not come from quoting tables.

It comes from:

• Physical pallet stacking
• Forklift trials
• Repeated export container execution
• Post-shipment verification

🏭 Authority Statement

If a supplier cannot explain why pallet height changes
or why CBM stabilizes across thicknesses,
they are not executing real factory-level packing.

They are estimating.

---

🧭 How to Read This FAQ Correctly

These questions exist because most buyers were taught to think in CBM first.

This FAQ is not an add-on.
It is a correction of assumptions, grounded in the factory logic already established in Sections 4–9.

These images and videos demonstrate why plywood container packing calculation cannot be finalized in spreadsheets.
Packing logic is proven at execution stage — not assumed in theory.

🔷 SECTION 12 – COMPLIANCE & AUDIT CONTEXT

Why Factory Packing Data Must Stand Up to Customs & EUDR Audits

🧠 Role of This Section (Legal & Compliance Shield)

This section is not about laws, regulations, or legal theory.

It explains why the packing data in this document can withstand audits,
not because it looks correct, but because it is structurally consistent across the entire export documentation chain.

If an audit occurs, this data does not need to be defended.
It explains itself.

---

📄 12.1 Packing Is Not a Standalone Table — It Is Part of a Documentation System

A common misconception is treating packing data as an isolated reference.

In real export operations, packing data is inseparable from documentation.

Packing logic must align with:

• 📦 Packing List
• 📄 Commercial Invoice
• 🚢 Bill of Lading
• 🧾 Customs declaration
• 🌍 EUDR / due diligence dossier

🔒 Structural Reality

If packing data does not align across all documents,
it is not considered “incorrect” —
it is considered unexplainable, which is worse.

---

🧩 12.2 The Three Audit Pillars: Consistent – Traceable – Explainable

Every number in this document is designed to satisfy three non-negotiable audit pillars.

🔁 Consistent

• The same logic governs packing tables, invoices, and shipping documents
• No manual adjustment is required downstream
• CBM, weight, pallet count, and sheet count never contradict each other

🔍 Traceable

• Each figure can be traced back to:
  • Pallet height
  • Sheet size
  • Density assumption
  • Payload constraint
• No “black box” numbers exist

🧠 Explainable

• Every number can be explained verbally and logically
• Not just calculated, but justified under questioning

🧾 Audit Rule of Thumb

If a number cannot be explained backwards,
it does not survive inspection.

---

📉 12.3 Why Spreadsheet-Only Suppliers Fail Audits

Many suppliers rely on spreadsheet-based packing estimates.

These usually fail audits because:

• CBM is optimized without payload context
• Pallet height is assumed, not controlled
• Weight concentration per pallet is ignored
• Adjustments are made visually, not structurally

⚠️ Audit Failure Pattern

When questioned, spreadsheet-only suppliers can recalculate.
They cannot explain.

Recalculation does not satisfy auditors.
Explanation does.

---

🏭 12.4 Why HCPLY Can Explain Every Number Backwards

HCPLY packing data is derived from factory execution, not estimation.

Each number can be explained in reverse order:

• Net weight → derived from CBM × verified density
• CBM → derived from sheet count × sheet volume
• Sheet count → derived from pallet height & thickness
• Pallet height → fixed by payload & forklift safety
• Pallet count → fixed by container geometry & payload ceiling

🔒 Factory Authority Statement

Nothing in this document exists because “it fits in Excel.”

It exists because it has been physically executed, verified, and repeated.

---

🧠 12.5 Why This Matters Under EUDR & Customs Review

Under modern compliance frameworks, including EUDR:

• Inspectors do not validate your intention
• They validate your internal consistency

If packing data:

• Conflicts with invoices
• Requires ad-hoc explanation
• Changes between shipments

It becomes a risk signal, regardless of legality.

🌍 Compliance Insight

Consistency across documents reduces audit friction
more effectively than any declaration or statement.

---

🛃 12.6 Port-Specific Payload Constraints (Shallow & Restricted Ports)

While all packing tables in Sections 4–9 are optimized against the technical payload ceiling of 28.5 MT for a 40HC container, real-world execution may introduce additional operational constraints.

In certain shallow-water ports, restricted terminals, or customer-designated discharge ports, the allowable container payload may be limited to 24–26 MT, regardless of container specification.

This limitation is not theoretical.
It is enforced operationally at port level.

---

🔒 Factory Execution Principle

When such port-specific payload constraints apply, HCPLY does not redesign packing logic or alter the documentation structure.

Adjustments are executed by:

• Reducing pallet height within the same stacking logic
• Lowering sheet count per pallet proportionally
• Preserving pallet count and container layout geometry
• Maintaining full consistency across packing list, commercial invoice, and bill of lading

No arbitrary rebalancing is permitted.

---

🧠 Compliance & Audit Reality

From an audit and customs perspective, this approach ensures that:

• All figures remain consistent
• Every adjustment remains traceable
• Each number remains explainable backward to the original factory packing logic

Port-specific payload limits change the operational ceiling,
not the structural integrity of the packing system.

Key Operational Insight
Port constraints adjust allowable payload — they do not justify breaking packing logic, document alignment, or audit clarity.

🔐 12.7 What This Section Protects — And What It Does Not

This section protects against:

• CBM-related disputes
• Payload discrepancy flags
• “Why is this number different?” questioning
• Document inconsistency audits

It does not attempt to:

• Replace legal counsel
• Interpret regulations
• Provide jurisdiction-specific legal advice

Its purpose is narrower — and stronger.

🛡️ Final Compliance Framing

When packing logic is consistent, traceable, and explainable,
audits become verification exercises — not investigations.

🔷 SECTION 13 – INTERNAL LINK HUB

(Factory-Level Technical Reference Network)

The following references extend the factory-executed plywood container packing calculation presented in this document.
They support technical verification, buyer understanding, and audit traceability.

---

🔹 13.1 Container Packing Logic & Pallet Execution

• How Plywood Sheets Are Packed for Export – Factory Packing Logic Explained
  Explains real pallet stacking rules, pallet height control, and container geometry constraints applied in factory execution.
• Vietnam Packing Plywood Specifications – Complete Factory Guide
  Provides a structured overview of plywood packing specifications used consistently across export documentation.
• Vietnam Packing Plywood Exporters for Heavy-Duty Loads
  Focuses on payload-dominated packing programs where container loading is governed by weight rather than CBM.

---

🔹 13.2 Core Density, Weight & Load Behavior

• Vietnam Plywood Density and Weight – What Buyers Should Know
  Explains how core density directly affects pallet height, sheet count, and container payload limits.
• Vietnam Eucalyptus Core Plywood – Cost vs Strength
  Analyzes high-density core behavior under strict container payload constraints.
• Acacia Core Plywood Vietnam – Load-Bearing Performance
  Describes balanced-density core behavior commonly used in optimized factory pallet programs.
• Styrax Core Plywood Vietnam – Performance vs Eucalyptus
  Compares lightweight and heavyweight cores from a container loading and stability perspective.
• Plywood Core Selection Guide – Vietnam Plywood Manufacturer Insight
  Connects core selection decisions with downstream packing logic, logistics efficiency, and audit outcomes.

---

🔹 13.3 Factory Execution, Tolerance & Quality Control

• Plywood Quality Control Inside a Vietnam Factory
  Demonstrates how factory quality control systems ensure repeatable packing results across shipments.
• Understanding Thickness Tolerance in Vietnam Plywood
  Explains why thickness tolerance directly impacts pallet stacking stability and container consistency.
• How to Identify Good Core Veneer in Vietnamese Plywood
  Links material quality to packing reliability and audit explainability.

---

🔹 13.4 Compliance, Audit & EUDR Context

• EUDR vs EUTR – What EU Timber Importers Must Understand
  Clarifies regulatory expectations affecting packing data consistency and documentation alignment.
• EUDR Mandatory 2026 – Impact on European Plywood Importers
  Explains how audit scrutiny shifts from declarations to internal data consistency.
• HCPLY EUDR & EUTR Compliance Framework
  Outlines HCPLY’s internal compliance structure supporting traceable export documentation.
• 7 Essential Plywood Import Documents Explained
  Connects packing data with packing list, invoice, bill of lading, and customs declaration.

---

🔒 Authority Disclaimer
The references above are technical resources, not marketing material.
They support factory-executed palletization, payload control, and audit explainability as demonstrated in this document.

“This packing specification is provided as a factory technical reference and must not be reproduced or redistributed without execution context.”

Last updated based on 2026 factory loading programs

🔷 SECTION 14 – AUTHORITY CLOSE

(Factory-Level Reference, Not a Commercial Estimate)

This document is not a trader’s estimate, a quoting table, or a theoretical packing model.

It is a factory-issued technical reference, built from:

• Physical pallet stacking
• Repeated container execution
• Verified payload behavior
• Document-level consistency across real exports

Every packing table, adjustment rule, and constraint described in this document exists because it has been executed, not because it looks optimal on paper.

These figures are designed to be:

• Used directly by professional buyers
• Explained confidently during inspection or audit
• Repeated consistently across shipments without reinterpretation

They are not optimized to look full.
They are optimized to load, ship, clear, and repeat without risk.

🏭 Final Authority Statement

If a packing configuration cannot be executed on the factory floor,
explained to customs, and traced across documents,
it does not belong in this reference.

For buyers operating structured programs or port-specific constraints,
packing customization is possible — within controlled factory rules.

👉 Request packing customization for your program.